MIT CSAIL Study Challenges Job Displacement Fears: AI Impact Less Severe Than Anticipated

Amelia Smith
January 23, 2024
Artificial Intelligence, Info Gallery, TechTalk

A new study from MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) addresses the pressing questions about AI’s potential to automate human jobs, the specific roles at risk, and the timing of such displacements.

Amid various predictions of AI’s widespread impact on jobs, including estimates from Goldman Sachs and McKinsey, MIT’s research diverges, emphasizing the importance of assessing the feasibility and economic viability of AI replacing certain roles.

Also Read: Future Horizons: Google DeepMind Co-Founder Contemplates AI-Generated CEOs in Startups

Contrary to popular expectations, the MIT researchers discovered that the majority of jobs considered at risk of AI displacement are not currently “economically beneficial” to automate. The study suggests that the impending AI disruption might unfold more slowly and less dramatically than previously thought.

It’s crucial to note that the study focused exclusively on jobs requiring visual analysis, leaving the potential impact of text- and image-generating models for follow-up studies.

To conduct the study, researchers surveyed workers to understand the tasks an AI system would need to accomplish to replace their jobs fully. They then modeled the cost of building such a system and assessed whether businesses would be willing to cover the expenses.

The study delves into an example involving a baker to illustrate that, despite automation potential, economic factors make AI less attractive for certain tasks. Even with rapid cost decreases, the researchers argue that it would take decades for computer vision tasks to become economically efficient for firms.

While the study acknowledges some limitations, including not considering cases where AI augments human labor, it offers insights into the timeline and economic factors influencing AI job automation.

The MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab backed the study, emphasizing the importance of preparing for AI job automation while highlighting the need to decrease deployment costs and expand AI’s scope for broader economic attractiveness.